Welcome!

This is the online ePortfolio of Jun Hu, Justin Shek (0842536), and Arthur Wong (0957192), students in the Medical Radiation Sciences [Radiography] program with McMaster University and Mohawk College.

Radiographic imaging is a fundamental component of diagnosis in the clinical setting. However, there are various potential sources of error that can produce images that are unusable for diagnosis. The aim of quality control in the radiographic imaging setting is to minimize errors made because of human or apparatus error.

The content of this ePortfolio pertains to the labs, modules, assignments, and assessments of our quality control course, MEDRADSC 3H03: Quality Control in Radiography. By discussing the expectations, goals, and achievements of the aforementioned material, we hope to show how our understanding and appreciation of quality control practices in a radiographic setting will progress.

We have chosen to create this ePortfolio through an online blog format over other formats for three reasons:

1. Various media formats (text, audio, video, images, etc.) are supported
2. Online hosting makes updates and posts possible from virtually anywhere
3. Updates can be added at the poster's leisure and are not restricted to any one user's computer

Furthermore, by posting directly online it is our hope that information and knowledge in this ePortfolio can be more rapidly shared with the world than through conventional means.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

kVp Accuracy



In every day’s use of radiographic equipments, technologists must select optimistic kVp for all examinations according to patient size, diagnostic purpose, and etc. In diagnostic radiography, kVp is very powerful. A variation of approximately 4% is necessary to influence image optical density and image contrast.  kVp can significantly affect image quality, special resolution, tube load, and most importantly, the patient dose. Therefore, x ray generator must be calibrated periodical and scheduledly by quality control technologists.

This quality control test can be performed in rooms 3, 4, 5, or 6. My group decided to do it in room 5. First of all, we need to change the mAs from 15 into 16 in our lab manual, because the x ray console does not allow us to select 15 mAs. Secondly, when we collimate the x-ray field to the kVp meter during the test, we need to make sure we collimate to include the sensor ( showed in the middle of meter), but not the whole meter.








We change the kVp setting into 60 kVp (5mAs), 81kVp (5mAs), and 102kVp (5mAs), then for the same kVp settings we use 16 mAs. For each setting, we expose 3 times. Then record the reading from kVp meter for each setting. All the collected data is in the following chart:

Nominal kVp
mAs
Measured kVp  1
Measured kVp 2
Measured kVp 3
Average kVp
60
5
59.6
59.6
59.5
59.57
60
16
59.6
59.6
59.7
59.63
81
5
82.3
82.4
82.3
82.33
81
16
81.9
81.9
81.9
81.9
102
5
102.9
102.9
102.9
102.9
102
16
102.4
102.5
102.4
102.43



According to SC35, the loading factors must not deviated from the selected value, for any combination of loading factors, by more than 10% for x-ray tube voltage.

According to HARP standards, the average peak kilovoltage corresponds to the selected value to within + 8%

Therefore, the x-ray equipment in room 5 is working properly.

By looking at the chart, we will find that the reading from each measurement at the same kVp and mAs setting is slightly different sometimes. Is the reading a true reading? The answer is yes. They are all correct in their own ways. The reason why there is a difference is because there is an inherent, random variation in all measurements.

1 comment:

  1. Hello,
    Send me pls price for model 815 kvp meter.
    BR
    Zeev
    meditech@netvision.net.il

    ReplyDelete