Welcome!

This is the online ePortfolio of Jun Hu, Justin Shek (0842536), and Arthur Wong (0957192), students in the Medical Radiation Sciences [Radiography] program with McMaster University and Mohawk College.

Radiographic imaging is a fundamental component of diagnosis in the clinical setting. However, there are various potential sources of error that can produce images that are unusable for diagnosis. The aim of quality control in the radiographic imaging setting is to minimize errors made because of human or apparatus error.

The content of this ePortfolio pertains to the labs, modules, assignments, and assessments of our quality control course, MEDRADSC 3H03: Quality Control in Radiography. By discussing the expectations, goals, and achievements of the aforementioned material, we hope to show how our understanding and appreciation of quality control practices in a radiographic setting will progress.

We have chosen to create this ePortfolio through an online blog format over other formats for three reasons:

1. Various media formats (text, audio, video, images, etc.) are supported
2. Online hosting makes updates and posts possible from virtually anywhere
3. Updates can be added at the poster's leisure and are not restricted to any one user's computer

Furthermore, by posting directly online it is our hope that information and knowledge in this ePortfolio can be more rapidly shared with the world than through conventional means.

Monday, March 5, 2012

Conclusion of Cluster 2

Conclusion of Cluster 2


The three lab tests that are coveredin this week are kVp accuracy, timer accuracy and Dr flatfield QC. The kvP accuracy test is to check if theselected kVp from the control console is actually the same as the measured kVpfrom a kVp meter. From the kVp accuracy table, the averaged measured kVp inroom 5 falls under the acceptance range according to HARP and SC35. TimerAccuracy is to test the measured the actual exposure time. Results show bothroom 3 and 6 are functioning properly and the timers are well calibrated as theresults collected are within the acceptable range enforced by SC 35 and HARP. ForDR flatfield QC, by performing a QAP, we can tell how many dead pixels arepresent in the detector. The result showed there was only one dead pixel androom 6 passed the quality control test. Although, all the rooms are functioning properly, it does not mean therooms do not require any more quality control tests. In fact, QC tests shouldbe carried out as the same way as they are to make sure the equipments aremaintain at a high level performance.

No comments:

Post a Comment